Best Sigma 28-70mm f/2.8-4 DG Aspherical Large Aperture Zoom Lens for Canon SLR Cameras
You can buy Sigma 28-70mm f/2.8-4 DG Aspherical Large Aperture Zoom Lens for Canon SLR Cameras today at the best price and it's limited time offer. Look at our special deals today on our store. Get more and spend less when you buy Sigma 28-70mm f/2.8-4 DG Aspherical Large Aperture Zoom Lens for Canon SLR Cameras. Also read our Sigma 28-70mm f/2.8-4 DG Aspherical Large Aperture Zoom Lens for Canon SLR Cameras reviews before you decide to buy Sigma 28-70mm f/2.8-4 DG Aspherical Large Aperture Zoom Lens for Canon SLR Cameras. Anything you have to know about this item, More about this
Buy Sigma 28-70mm f/2.8-4 DG Aspherical Large Aperture Zoom Lens for Canon SLR Cameras at Best Price
This site is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to amazon.com
Sigma 28-70mm f/2.8-4 DG Aspherical Large Aperture Zoom Lens for Canon SLR Cameras Reviews
Many customers was gave reviews and ratings to Sigma 28-70mm f/2.8-4 DG Aspherical Large Aperture Zoom Lens for Canon SLR Cameras. If you want to read those detail to make your decision on this product just CLICK HERE
Sigma 28-70mm f/2.8-4 DG Aspherical Large Aperture Zoom Lens for Canon SLR Cameras Overview:
- Large f2.8 aperture at 28-millimeter focal length; 6.5x zoom magnification
- Minimum focusing distance of 19.7 inches
- Multilayer lens coating and design reduce flare and ghost
- High image quality through entire zoom range with aspherical lens element
- For Canon 35mm and digital SLR cameras; supplied lens hood blocks out extraneous light
Sigma 28-70mm f/2.8-4 DG Aspherical Large Aperture Zoom Lens for Canon SLR Cameras Reviews, On Sale Sigma 28-70mm f/2.8-4 DG Aspherical Large Aperture Zoom Lens for Canon SLR Cameras, buy Sigma 28-70mm f/2.8-4 DG Aspherical Large Aperture Zoom Lens for Canon SLR Cameras, Sigma 28-70mm f/2.8-4 DG Aspherical Large Aperture Zoom Lens for Canon SLR Cameras best buy, Sigma 28-70mm f/2.8-4 DG Aspherical Large Aperture Zoom Lens for Canon SLR Cameras Discount, Sigma 28-70mm f/2.8-4 DG Aspherical Large Aperture Zoom Lens for Canon SLR Cameras For Sale
Sigma 28-70mm f/2.8-4 DG Aspherical Large Aperture Zoom Lens for Canon SLR Cameras Reviews
22 of 23 people found the following review helpful 
Pretty Decent Lens, December 24, 2006 By This review is from: Sigma 28-70mm f/2.8-4 DG Aspherical Large Aperture Zoom Lens for Canon SLR Cameras (Electronics) First of all, you are looking at a low end lens. Don't expect to get the same results you would get from a $1000+ lens because it's not going to happen.
I've had this lens for a couple of weeks and I'm pretty happy with the images I got from it. I bought this lens as a secondary lens. I use it mostly for family pics, or non-job related shootings.
Personally, I think that for the price you can't beat it. It's a pretty decent lens. You may want to check some of the images that I uploaded here (product images).
Bottom line. If you have big money to expend on an expensive lens, then go for it. But if you are looking for an affordable lens, this could be it.
8 of 8 people found the following review helpful 
Is it better than the Rebel XT kit lens?..., July 10, 2007 By This review is from: Sigma 28-70mm f/2.8-4 DG Aspherical Large Aperture Zoom Lens for Canon SLR Cameras (Electronics) Well, you get what you pay for. I was looking for an alternative lens that was in the Xt's kit lens range because I didn't have a lot of money. The Xt's kit lens stinks below f/8 & I didn't expect the Sigma to be "much" better but I bought it used on a deal. I put both on a tripod and shot the same building scene on a sunny day. I found the Sigma to have less purple fringing especially in the lower f-stops where the Canon was terrible. Both are good from f/8 above but I felt the Sigma was a little sharper & that's why I use it over the Xt kit lens. Autofocus noise doesn't bother me much and it focuses fast enough for me (non pro). Build quality feels better than the Xt kit lens. You get a plastic hood for it, not on kit lens. Just remember...it's a low end lens so the 2.8 is almost useless. Just about any point & shoot will look sharper at 2.8 than this thing. It's pretty bad wide open & there's no point in using it. But I knew that when I was buying it and use it for... Read more
5 of 5 people found the following review helpful 
Good starter lens, December 14, 2007 This review is from: Sigma 28-70mm f/2.8-4 DG Aspherical Large Aperture Zoom Lens for Canon SLR Cameras (Electronics) Decided to buy this lens after purchasing a [body only] Canon Rebel XTi. Comparing this with the Canon kit lens will reveal insignificant differences. Both decent lenses for basic still photos, but it really shoots as a 45mm-112mm lens because of the XTi's 1.6x field of view crop factor. Next step is an upgrade to a wider view Sigma 18-200mm lens [[ASIN: B000NOSCGM]]. I've seen photos with this lens that are stunning. Canon lenses are excellent, IMO, but they tend to be overpriced for the minimum quality trade-off with third party lenses like Sigma or Tamron.
› See all 18 customer reviews...
| 22 of 23 people found the following review helpful Pretty Decent Lens, By This review is from: Sigma 28-70mm f/2.8-4 DG Aspherical Large Aperture Zoom Lens for Canon SLR Cameras (Electronics) First of all, you are looking at a low end lens. Don't expect to get the same results you would get from a $1000+ lens because it's not going to happen.I've had this lens for a couple of weeks and I'm pretty happy with the images I got from it. I bought this lens as a secondary lens. I use it mostly for family pics, or non-job related shootings. Personally, I think that for the price you can't beat it. It's a pretty decent lens. You may want to check some of the images that I uploaded here (product images). Bottom line. If you have big money to expend on an expensive lens, then go for it. But if you are looking for an affordable lens, this could be it. 8 of 8 people found the following review helpful Is it better than the Rebel XT kit lens?..., By This review is from: Sigma 28-70mm f/2.8-4 DG Aspherical Large Aperture Zoom Lens for Canon SLR Cameras (Electronics) Well, you get what you pay for. I was looking for an alternative lens that was in the Xt's kit lens range because I didn't have a lot of money. The Xt's kit lens stinks below f/8 & I didn't expect the Sigma to be "much" better but I bought it used on a deal. I put both on a tripod and shot the same building scene on a sunny day. I found the Sigma to have less purple fringing especially in the lower f-stops where the Canon was terrible. Both are good from f/8 above but I felt the Sigma was a little sharper & that's why I use it over the Xt kit lens. Autofocus noise doesn't bother me much and it focuses fast enough for me (non pro). Build quality feels better than the Xt kit lens. You get a plastic hood for it, not on kit lens. Just remember...it's a low end lens so the 2.8 is almost useless. Just about any point & shoot will look sharper at 2.8 than this thing. It's pretty bad wide open & there's no point in using it. But I knew that when I was buying it and use it for... Read more 5 of 5 people found the following review helpful Good starter lens, This review is from: Sigma 28-70mm f/2.8-4 DG Aspherical Large Aperture Zoom Lens for Canon SLR Cameras (Electronics) Decided to buy this lens after purchasing a [body only] Canon Rebel XTi. Comparing this with the Canon kit lens will reveal insignificant differences. Both decent lenses for basic still photos, but it really shoots as a 45mm-112mm lens because of the XTi's 1.6x field of view crop factor. Next step is an upgrade to a wider view Sigma 18-200mm lens [[ASIN: B000NOSCGM]]. I've seen photos with this lens that are stunning. Canon lenses are excellent, IMO, but they tend to be overpriced for the minimum quality trade-off with third party lenses like Sigma or Tamron. |
› See all 18 customer reviews...
digitalcamerasale9 handheldinvacuums bestvacuumoncleaner
No comments:
Post a Comment